First, let me extoll the dedication of Van's. They went beyond what I would have expected in looking in to this issue for me, even though their diagnosis wasn't correct (let's be fair, they can't actually get their eyes and hands on my parts). They are going to send me a replacement rear spar and doubler. They are a great company to work with and are customer focused!
Previously, I had indicated that the rear spar on the horizontal stabilizer was grossly misaligned with the stab assembly. In fact, it was simply not possible to rivet it in. It seems it wasn't related to the bow in the spar. Other -14 builders I consulted with indicated that their rear spars also had a prominent bow and it wasn't an issue in the final assembly for them.
An example of what I was up against is shown below. Notice how the trajectories of the unset rivets are off (in fact the lower
left-most one can't even fit through the hole) and the skin pushing away from the spar maximally at the red line. The associated dimples won't sit in their countersinks either. What's interesting was that the misalignment was not progressive, but rather discontinuous at the red line and happened at the same four (symmetric) places along the rear spar: Between the 26th and 27th rivets when counting from outboard on all four corners.
Previously, I had indicated that the rear spar on the horizontal stabilizer was grossly misaligned with the stab assembly. In fact, it was simply not possible to rivet it in. It seems it wasn't related to the bow in the spar. Other -14 builders I consulted with indicated that their rear spars also had a prominent bow and it wasn't an issue in the final assembly for them.
After spending several hours trying to determine the cause of the problem, including a visit from a tech counselor, a RV-9A builder, a call to Van's and several emails with the latter, everyone concluded the problem was most likely a twist induced in the assembly when it was riveted together. However, I wasn't convinced that the stab was twisted. Since the issue presented itself as a discontinuity in rivet alignment, I couldn't wrap my mind around the problem being my assembly having a twist. After all, wouldn't a twist manifest with a progressive misalignment? So, I was quite certain that the spar was mis-drilled at the factory, but I approached the problem with an open mind since I'm often (well, frequently...actually, just about all the time) wrong.
So, to chase down the alleged twist, I tried
- Cleco'ing in various orders to see if the misalignment could be "chased" in one direction or another. It couldn't.
- Applying forces to the assembly at various points to slip rivets in with a straight trajectory. That wasn't successful (and having rivets in sheer is not good)
- Pulling a string line through the rib tooling holes in the assembly to check for twist. It looked pretty good
- Van's suggested seeing if anything changes when the spar is inserted backwards (top-to-bottom). Problem persisted
- The great folks at Van's even tried a few mockups with parts from different batches and couldn't reproduce my problem. They continued to feel it was a twist and suggested removing some rivets and reworking the assembly
At each point in the above diagnosis progression, I found no evidence of a twisted assembly. Ultimately, I requested the rivet spacing for the parts. The standard spacing is 1.125". Sure enough, right where I identified the misalignments on my spar (each of the four places I marked), I found one pair of misdrilled holes at 1.175", 0.05" too big. The corresponding holes in the skin did not have this additional 0.05" spacing (see this later post which expands on that statement). This explains the issue I had and why it manifested as a discontinuous affair rather than a progressive one. Images below illustrate my findings.
In retrospect, I should have just measured the holes as soon I
suspected that was the problem. However, I had it in my mind that the
holes had different spacings, like the J-stiffeners on the wings and
that thought locked me out of just measuring the holes. Had I just made the measurements, I would have saved a lot of time.
If you're curious why the spar's countersinks appear not to have been primed like the rest of the part, it's because I realized that my countersinks were slightly shallow, so I shaved off a few thousandths to bring them to the right depth. I had planned to spot prime them if the spar could align to the skins.
Visit this link for the next entry, 8-May-14, on this issue. It includes the reason why the spar was mis-punched at the factory.
If you're curious why the spar's countersinks appear not to have been primed like the rest of the part, it's because I realized that my countersinks were slightly shallow, so I shaved off a few thousandths to bring them to the right depth. I had planned to spot prime them if the spar could align to the skins.
Visit this link for the next entry, 8-May-14, on this issue. It includes the reason why the spar was mis-punched at the factory.
No comments:
Post a Comment